Jan 17, 2017 . If your clients are hoping to recoup some of the value on their new deck project, a wood deck is still a better investment than a composite deck,.
Jul 27, 2014 . When it comes to costs, Decks will always be the less expensive option. . showing that the return on investment for a wood deck is 87 percent, surpassing . 25 years with no maintenance, holding its value for the entire time.
Add a 16-by-20-foot deck using pressure-treated joists supported by 4x4 posts anchored to concrete piers. Install composite deck material in a simple linear.
Aug 28, 2014 . In fact, a survey from Home Remodeling magazine's 2014 Cost vs. . composite decks return about 74% of their original cost and wood decks.
The cost and upkeep associated with each type of decking. . Wood vs. Composite Decking Picture I live for warm southern nights, which around here include.
Mar 20, 2013 . Natural vs. composite decking materials. You have two main . The main reason people choose wood is for the initial cost savings. The main.
Feb 13, 2013 . Patio vs. Deck: A Cost Comparison. As with all renovation projects, your . Value Report in 2013 states the average cost of a midrange deck addition project runs around $15,000 for a composite deck and $9,327 for wood.
Jan 27, 2009 . Last summer I built a 390 sq foot deck off of the back of my . Info not consider deck as a value factor I consider it a potential factor .. Remodeling Magazine's "Remodeling Cost vs. Value Report for 2007" found that more than 85% of the cost of building a wooden deck could be recouped during resale.
May 17, 2016 . According to Remodeling Magazine's Cost vs Value Report, a homeowner . if a deck is built using composite, as opposed to wood materials.
Add a 16-by-20-foot deck using pressure-treated joists supported by 4x4 posts anchored to concrete piers. At one corner, add a second, 10-foot-diameter.
Mar 12, 2015 . According to Remodeling Magazine's Cost vs. Value Report, a wood deck in Maryland carries an average return on investment of 78.6%, while.
Quick Summary: Composite vs Wood Deck Cost. On average, a pressure-treated wood deck will cost . Both prices include the cost of materials and installation.
The average cost of composite decking is $35 per square foot. See why more homeowners are adding composite decks as opposed to wood!
New options mean your next deck may not even be real wood. . According to the annual Remodeling magazine "Cost vs. Value Report," you'll get back nearly 75 percent of what you pay for a deck if you sell your home within the first year after the deck is .. Most composite lumber by itself costs around $3 per square foot.
According to the “Cost vs. Value Report” from “Remodeling” magazine, the national average cost to have a basic, all-pressure-treated wood deck professionally.
Jan 29, 2014 . Best Decking Material for Your Deck; Compare Composite Decks vs Wood . The prices from the cheapest to the most expensive decking.
The cost of a professionally built pressured-treated wood deck starts at about $15 per . The cost for an elaborately built deck using costly hardwoods or composite materials . so you can get a range of prices and find one that suits what you can afford. . to Hanley Wood's Remodeling magazine's annual 2011-12 Cost vs.
Jun 19, 2015 . . wood deck in Maryland is 83.3%, which is 3% higher than the national average, according to Remodeling Magazine's annual Cost vs. Value.
Feb 15, 2016 . Here's a look at wood vs. composite. . Not just a wood alternative, composite decking is preferred by many homeowners for its low cost, good looks, durability, and easy-care nature. . Naturally UV-resistant choices are available, like red cedar; Can offer structural strength and resale value to your property.